Radeon PRO W7900 vs R6 (Mullins)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.62

PRO W7900 outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 11777% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking120313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.09
Power efficiencyno data17.53
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameMullinsNavi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1286144
Core clock speed500 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2495 MHz
Number of transistorsno data57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data295 Watt
Texture fill rateno data958.1
Floating-point processing powerno data61.32 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data864.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−11329%
800−850
+11329%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−11329%
800−850
+11329%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−11775%
950−1000
+11775%
Valorant 27−30
−11624%
3400−3450
+11624%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−11329%
800−850
+11329%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−11567%
2100−2150
+11567%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Dota 2 12−14
−11567%
1400−1450
+11567%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−11775%
950−1000
+11775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%
Valorant 27−30
−11624%
3400−3450
+11624%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−11329%
800−850
+11329%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
Dota 2 12−14
−11567%
1400−1450
+11567%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−11775%
950−1000
+11775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%
Valorant 27−30
−11624%
3400−3450
+11624%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−11567%
350−400
+11567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−11567%
1750−1800
+11567%
Valorant 4−5
−11150%
450−500
+11150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−10900%
110−120
+10900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−11400%
230−240
+11400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 73.64
Recency 29 April 2014 13 April 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

PRO W7900 has a 11777.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Radeon R6 (Mullins)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 81 vote

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 (Mullins) or Radeon PRO W7900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.