RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, including specs and performance data.

R6 (Mullins)
2014
0.59

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 16849% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12701
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.83
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameMullinsGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)18 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12824064
Core clock speed500 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,968.0
Floating-point processing powerno data126 TFLOPS
ROPsno data192
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−16775%
1350−1400
+16775%
Valorant 27−30
−16686%
4700−4750
+16686%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−16844%
3050−3100
+16844%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%
Dota 2 12−14
−16567%
2000−2050
+16567%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−16775%
1350−1400
+16775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Valorant 27−30
−16686%
4700−4750
+16686%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%
Dota 2 12−14
−16567%
2000−2050
+16567%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−16775%
1350−1400
+16775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−15900%
800−850
+15900%
Valorant 27−30
−16686%
4700−4750
+16686%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−16567%
500−550
+16567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−16567%
500−550
+16567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−16567%
1000−1050
+16567%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−15900%
160−170
+15900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−16686%
2350−2400
+16686%
Valorant 3−4
−16567%
500−550
+16567%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−14900%
300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.59 100.00
Recency 29 April 2014 18 March 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a 16849% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon R6 (Mullins) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 851 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R6 (Mullins) or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.