Quadro T600 Mobile vs Radeon R6 (Mullins)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 (Mullins) with Quadro T600 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T600 Mobile outperforms R6 (Mullins) by a whopping 2475% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 1154 | 307 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.1 (2014) | Turing (2018−2021) |
| GPU code name | Mullins | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 29 April 2014 (10 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 128 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 40 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 74.76 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R6 (Mullins) and Quadro T600 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 2475% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Benchmark coverage: 14%
Quadro T600 Mobile outperforms Radeon R6 (Mullins) by 2289% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−5000%
| 51
+5000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−3100%
|
30−35
+3100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−3200%
|
65−70
+3200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3
−2550%
|
53
+2550%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2500%
|
50−55
+2500%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Hitman 3 | 1−2
−3100%
|
30−35
+3100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 2−3
−3200%
|
65−70
+3200%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
−3800%
|
39
+3800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−2500%
|
52
+2500%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2500%
|
50−55
+2500%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−2500%
|
24−27
+2500%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2700%
|
28
+2700%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 2−3
−2500%
|
50−55
+2500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 3−4 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K
High Preset
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 18−20 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2600%
|
50−55
+2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−2550%
|
53
+2550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−4500%
|
45−50
+4500%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2600%
|
50−55
+2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4800%
|
49
+4800%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−2650%
|
55−60
+2650%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−4500%
|
45−50
+4500%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−2700%
|
27−30
+2700%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−2600%
|
50−55
+2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4400%
|
45
+4400%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−4400%
|
45−50
+4400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
−3200%
|
30−35
+3200%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−2900%
|
30−33
+2900%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−2600%
|
27−30
+2600%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
−3000%
|
30−35
+3000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 18−20 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−3100%
|
30−35
+3100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−3000%
|
30−35
+3000%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−3100%
|
30−35
+3100%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Hitman 3 | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| Battlefield 5 | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 6−7 |
This is how R6 (Mullins) and T600 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T600 Mobile is 5000% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 16.48 |
| Recency | 29 April 2014 | 12 April 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
The Quadro T600 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Mullins) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R6 (Mullins) is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T600 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
