Radeon RX 7600M vs R6 M340DX
Aggregated performance score
RX 7600M outperforms R6 M340DX by 255% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 747 | 407 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | RDNA 3 |
| GPU code name | Jet | Navi 33 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 3 June 2015 (8 years ago) | 5 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 704 | 1792 |
| Boost clock speed | 1030 MHz | 2070 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 690 million | 13,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 90 Watt (50 - 90 Watt TGP) |
| Texture fill rate | 24.72 | 246.4 |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon R6 M340DX and Radeon RX 7600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 16000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 256.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10
−250%
| 35−40
+250%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−125%
|
27−30
+125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−144%
|
21−24
+144%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
−125%
|
27−30
+125%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6
−420%
|
24−27
+420%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
−275%
|
14−16
+275%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
−183%
|
16−18
+183%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10
−144%
|
21−24
+144%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6
−250%
|
21−24
+250%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
−483%
|
35−40
+483%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−550%
|
24−27
+550%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 4−5
−575%
|
27−30
+575%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−414%
|
35−40
+414%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3
−600%
|
21−24
+600%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−200%
|
14−16
+200%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−77.8%
|
16−18
+77.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−700%
|
8−9
+700%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
−117%
|
12−14
+117%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−300%
|
16−18
+300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
−1800%
|
18−20
+1800%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−233%
|
10−11
+233%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
−200%
|
9−10
+200%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−500%
|
6−7
+500%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
−83.3%
|
10−12
+83.3%
|
This is how R6 M340DX and RX 7600M compete in popular games:
- RX 7600M is 250% faster than R6 M340DX in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7600M is 1800% faster than the R6 M340DX.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RX 7600M surpassed R6 M340DX in all 53 of our tests.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 2.87 | 10.18 |
| Recency | 3 June 2015 | 5 January 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 M340DX in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
