UHD Graphics 750 vs Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R6 (Carrizo) and UHD Graphics 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
UHD Graphics 750 outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 951 | 631 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | no data |
GPU code name | Carrizo | Rocket Lake GT1 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 4 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | no data |
Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 2410 Million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12-35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 20.80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on Radeon R6 (Carrizo) and UHD Graphics 750 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | no data |
Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 11
−173%
| 30−35
+173%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−600%
|
27−30
+600%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−100%
|
30−33
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−33.3%
|
40−45
+33.3%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−600%
|
27−30
+600%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−100%
|
30−33
+100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14
−21.4%
|
16−18
+21.4%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−33.3%
|
40−45
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 6−7
−100%
|
12−14
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5
−150%
|
10−11
+150%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−200%
|
12−14
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−600%
|
27−30
+600%
|
Hitman 3 | 6−7
−66.7%
|
10−11
+66.7%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−100%
|
30−33
+100%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−113%
|
16−18
+113%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−54.5%
|
16−18
+54.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 30−35
−33.3%
|
40−45
+33.3%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−300%
|
12−14
+300%
|
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 4−5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−150%
|
5−6
+150%
|
Hitman 3 | 7−8
−28.6%
|
9−10
+28.6%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 5−6
−100%
|
10−11
+100%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 7−8
−300%
|
27−30
+300%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−100%
|
8−9
+100%
|
4K
High Preset
Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−100%
|
2−3
+100%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 2−3 |
Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−66.7%
|
5−6
+66.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
This is how R6 (Carrizo) and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is 173% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics 750 is 600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 750 is ahead in 44 tests (75%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (25%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.47 | 4.49 |
Recency | 4 June 2015 | 30 March 2021 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 15 Watt |
R6 (Carrizo) has 25% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has a 205.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Carrizo) in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.