Radeon RX 6650 XT vs R6 (Carrizo)

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R6 (Carrizo)
2015
1.46

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by a whopping 2960% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking94371
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.87
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameCarrizoNavi 23
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2015 (8 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399
Current priceno data$465 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speedno data2055 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2635 MHz
Number of transistors2410 Million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt176 Watt
Texture fill rateno data337.3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R6 (Carrizo) and Radeon RX 6650 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data17500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data280.3 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkanno data1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R6 (Carrizo) 1.46
RX 6650 XT 44.68
+2960%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 2960% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R6 (Carrizo) 4830
RX 6650 XT 105955
+2094%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 2094% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R6 (Carrizo) 1438
RX 6650 XT 41739
+2804%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 2804% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R6 (Carrizo) 909
RX 6650 XT 29796
+3178%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 3178% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R6 (Carrizo) 4717
RX 6650 XT 167944
+3460%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 3460% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R6 (Carrizo) 53703
RX 6650 XT 451929
+742%

RX 6650 XT outperforms R6 (Carrizo) by 742% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−1182%
141
+1182%
1440p2−3
−3500%
72
+3500%
4K1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3100%
128
+3100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1120%
120−130
+1120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−7050%
140−150
+7050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1700%
70−75
+1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2414%
176
+2414%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−1120%
120−130
+1120%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2100%
88
+2100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
Hitman 3 2−3
−7050%
140−150
+7050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−9600%
95−100
+9600%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−5000%
102
+5000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1700%
70−75
+1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−2029%
149
+2029%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−3540%
182
+3540%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 75−80
Battlefield 5 0−1 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1850%
78
+1850%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−13200%
130−140
+13200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2575%
107
+2575%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2433%
75−80
+2433%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2050%
85−90
+2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−713%
65−70
+713%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 35−40
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1660%
88
+1660%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5600%
114
+5600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−3300%
65−70
+3300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2050%
40−45
+2050%
Hitman 3 2−3
−2250%
45−50
+2250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−429%
35−40
+429%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 24−27

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 30−35
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 27−30
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55
+1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1100%
60
+1100%

This is how R6 (Carrizo) and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650 XT is 1182% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650 XT is 3500% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650 XT is 3700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6650 XT is 13200% faster than the R6 (Carrizo).

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6650 XT surpassed R6 (Carrizo) in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 44.68
Recency 4 June 2015 10 May 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 176 Watt

The Radeon RX 6650 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R6 (Carrizo) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R6 (Carrizo) is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6650 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
Radeon RX 6650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 13 votes

Rate Radeon R6 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 2732 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.