Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.
AI PRO R9700 outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 5253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1039 | 16 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.26 | 18.11 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Stoney Ridge | Navi 48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (9 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1660 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 2920 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 53,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 747.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 47.84 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 128 |
| TMUs | no data | 256 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 2518 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 644.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8
−4900%
| 400−450
+4900%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 1
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Fortnite | 7
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5194%
|
1800−1850
+5194%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
−5233%
|
1600−1650
+5233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−5194%
|
900−950
+5194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Fortnite | 4−5
−5150%
|
210−220
+5150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5194%
|
1800−1850
+5194%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−5194%
|
900−950
+5194%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−5233%
|
160−170
+5233%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−4900%
|
400−450
+4900%
|
| God of War | 6−7
−4900%
|
300−310
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
−4900%
|
500−550
+4900%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−5194%
|
1800−1850
+5194%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 4−5
−5150%
|
210−220
+5150%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
−5150%
|
210−220
+5150%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10
−4900%
|
450−500
+4900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−4900%
|
700−750
+4900%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−5100%
|
260−270
+5100%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−5150%
|
210−220
+5150%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−5233%
|
800−850
+5233%
|
| Valorant | 7−8
−4900%
|
350−400
+4900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 1−2
−4900%
|
50−55
+4900%
|
| God of War | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−4900%
|
100−105
+4900%
|
This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:
- AI PRO R9700 is 4900% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 71.19 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 23 July 2025 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 300 Watt |
R5 (Stoney Ridge) has 2400% lower power consumption.
AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 5252.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
