GeForce RTX 4080 vs Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) with GeForce RTX 4080, including specs and performance data.

R5 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
12 Watt
1.43

RTX 4080 outperforms R5 (Stoney Ridge) by a whopping 6044% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.09
Power efficiency2.2419.28
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeAD103
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1929728
Core clock speedno data2205 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rateno data761.5
Floating-point processing powerno data48.74 TFLOPS
ROPsno data112
TMUsno data304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data716.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1.43
RTX 4080 87.86
+6044%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 1264
RTX 4080 86267
+6725%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 3346
RTX 4080 143194
+4180%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 772
RTX 4080 57903
+7400%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 4755
RTX 4080 185431
+3800%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

R5 (Stoney Ridge) 51382
RTX 4080 769721
+1398%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2825%
234
+2825%
1440p2−3
−8050%
163
+8050%
4K1−2
−10600%
107
+10600%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.12
1440pno data7.36
4Kno data11.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−5925%
240−250
+5925%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2450%
200−210
+2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7600%
231
+7600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−5575%
227
+5575%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−9750%
190−200
+9750%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2613%
217
+2613%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7600%
231
+7600%
Far Cry 5 1
−22200%
223
+22200%
Fortnite 7
−4214%
300−350
+4214%
Forza Horizon 4 5
−6780%
300−350
+6780%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 249
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
Valorant 35−40
−1474%
550−600
+1474%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−5025%
205
+5025%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−9750%
190−200
+9750%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2425%
202
+2425%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−797%
270−280
+797%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6900%
210
+6900%
Dota 2 18−20
−1283%
249
+1283%
Fortnite 4−5
−7450%
300−350
+7450%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−4814%
300−350
+4814%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 239
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−17700%
178
+17700%
Metro Exodus 1
−21200%
213
+21200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8983%
545
+8983%
Valorant 35−40
−1474%
550−600
+1474%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−9750%
190−200
+9750%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2025%
170
+2025%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6233%
190
+6233%
Dota 2 18−20
−1194%
233
+1194%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−4814%
300−350
+4814%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4217%
259
+4217%
Valorant 35−40
−1543%
575
+1543%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−7450%
300−350
+7450%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−5633%
500−550
+5633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%
Valorant 7−8
−6829%
450−500
+6829%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−12800%
129
+12800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−20000%
201
+20000%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10100%
300−350
+10100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−9450%
191
+9450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−7450%
150−160
+7450%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−8900%
90−95
+8900%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1133%
185
+1133%
Valorant 7−8
−4643%
300−350
+4643%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 63
Dota 2 1−2
−22600%
227
+22600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−6900%
140
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 218
+0%
218
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 154
+0%
154
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 187
+0%
187
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

This is how R5 (Stoney Ridge) and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 2825% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 is 8050% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 is 10600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 22600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is ahead in 49 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 12 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 87.86
Recency 1 June 2016 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 320 Watt

R5 (Stoney Ridge) has 2566.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 6044.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
GeForce RTX 4080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 65 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4718 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) or GeForce RTX 4080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.