GeForce 7150M vs Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) and GeForce 7150M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
R5 (Stoney Ridge) outperforms 7150M by a whopping 3225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1061 | 1551 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.28 | no data |
| Architecture | GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016) | no data |
| GPU code name | Stoney Ridge | C67 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 June 2016 (10 years ago) | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 3 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 800 MHz | 425 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12-45 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | no data | shared Memory |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | no data |
| Shared memory | + | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (FL 12_0) | shared Memory |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 8 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 7 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5
+150%
|
2−3
−150%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+47.8%
|
21−24
−47.8%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 30−33
+233%
|
9−10
−233%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+47.8%
|
21−24
−47.8%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−11
+66.7%
|
6−7
−66.7%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+47.8%
|
21−24
−47.8%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 4−5 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 (Stoney Ridge) is 300% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 (Stoney Ridge) performs better in 19 tests (95%)
- there's a draw in 1 test (5%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 0.04 |
| Recency | 1 June 2016 | 1 February 2006 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 90 nm |
R5 (Stoney Ridge) has a 3225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
