RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon R5 M435

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M350DX R8 M435DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M435 with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R5 M435
2016
2 GB GDDR5
2.08

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms R5 M435 by a whopping 1630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 M435 R5 M435
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking927154
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data61.58
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameJetGB206
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 May 2016 (9 years ago)19 March 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3203328
Core clock speed780 MHz952 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1657 MHz
Number of transistors690 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate20.60172.3
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS11.03 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs20104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26
L1 Cache80 KB3.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1125 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth36 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1686%
125
+1686%
1440p4−5
−1650%
70
+1650%
4K4−5
−1925%
81
+1925%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 146
+0%
146
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 93
+0%
93
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how R5 M435 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 1686% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 1650% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is 1925% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 54 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.08 35.99
Recency 15 May 2016 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile has a 1630% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M435 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M435 is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
R5 M435 Radeon R5 M435
vs
R7 M365X Radeon R7 M365X
R5 M435 AMD R5 M435
vs
ATI V7760 V7760
R5 M435 AMD R5 M435
vs
Radeon 630 630
R5 M435 AMD R5 M435
vs
RX 5900 5900
R5 M435 AMD R5 M435
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder HD 3650 HD 3650
R5 M435 AMD R5 M435
vs
Jetson Xavier NX 16 GB Xavier NX 16 GB
R7 M465 AMD R7 M465
vs
ION 2 2
R7 M465 AMD R7 M465
vs
9400 GT Rev. 2 9400 GT Rev. 2
R7 M465 AMD R7 M465
vs
GT 240M LE 240M LE
R7 M465 AMD R7 M465
vs
L20
R7 M465X AMD R7 M465X
vs
ATI HD 4730 OEM 4730 OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 120 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M435 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M435 or RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.