GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs Radeon R5 M420

Place in the ranking	1040	6
Place by popularity	not in top-100	82
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	48.21
Power efficiency	no data	19.92
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Jet	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	8 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	8448
Core clock speed	780 MHz	2340 MHz
Boost clock speed	850 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	17.00	689.0
Floating-point processing power	0.544 TFLOPS	44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	96
TMUs	20	264
Tensor Cores	no data	264
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	16 GB/s	672.3 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M420 1.27

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 82.60
+6404%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M420 489

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 31754
+6394%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −7433%	226 +7433%
1440p	2−3 −7750%	157 +7750%
4K	1−2 −9500%	96 +9500%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.54
1440p	no data	5.09
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2600%	189 +2600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −6400%	260−270 +6400%
Elden Ring	2−3 −16300%	300−350 +16300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2600%	189 +2600%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −6400%	260−270 +6400%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −5089%	467 +5089%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2483%	150−160 +2483%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2343%	171 +2343%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −6400%	260−270 +6400%
Dota 2	1−2 −17300%	174 +17300%
Elden Ring	2−3 −16300%	300−350 +16300%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −1400%	150 +1400%
Fortnite	5−6 −6060%	300−350 +6060%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −4811%	442 +4811%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −17300%	174 +17300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1436%	210−220 +1436%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −2483%	150−160 +2483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −2386%	170−180 +2386%
World of Tanks	27−30 −933%	270−280 +933%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −11600%	110−120 +11600%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −2043%	150 +2043%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −6400%	260−270 +6400%
Dota 2	1−2 −6400%	65−70 +6400%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −1470%	150−160 +1470%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −4422%	407 +4422%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −1436%	210−220 +1436%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −2088%	170−180 +2088%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	90−95
World of Tanks	7−8 −7271%	500−550 +7271%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 −197%	95 +197%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −6233%	190−200 +6233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −3100%	160−170 +3100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −3875%	159 +3875%
Valorant	6−7 −6700%	400−450 +6700%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −1038%	182 +1038%
Elden Ring	0−1	130−140
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1113%	182 +1113%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −6867%	200−210 +6867%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	60−65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1113%	182 +1113%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −9000%	90−95 +9000%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −6400%	130−140 +6400%
Dota 2	16−18 −6150%	1000−1050 +6150%
Far Cry 5	0−1	100−110
Valorant	1−2 −23800%	230−240 +23800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus	79 +0%	79 +0%
Valorant	450−500 +0%	450−500 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

450−500

+0%

450−500

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	155 +0%	155 +0%
Elden Ring	240−250 +0%	240−250 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	155 +0%	155 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	306 +0%	306 +0%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	36 +0%	36 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Fortnite	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	162 +0%	162 +0%

This is how R5 M420 and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compete in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 7433% faster in 1080p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 7750% faster in 1440p
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 9500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 23800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is ahead in 35 tests (69%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (31%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.27	82.60
Recency	15 May 2016	8 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 6403.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M420 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.