FirePro W2100 vs Radeon R5 M420

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M420 with FirePro W2100, including specs and performance data.

R5 M420
2016
4 GB DDR3
1.27

W2100 outperforms R5 M420 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1039849
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.22
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameJetOland
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)12 August 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320320
Core clock speed780 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors690 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data26 Watt
Texture fill rate17.0013.60
Floating-point processing power0.544 TFLOPS0.4352 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs2020

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Form factorno datalow profile / half length
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DisplayPort
DisplayPort countno data2
Dual-link DVI support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M420 1.27
FirePro W2100 2.35
+85%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M420 489
FirePro W2100 903
+84.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−85.7%
13
+85.7%
4K1−2
−100%
2
+100%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Elden Ring 0−1 4−5

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Elden Ring 0−1 4−5
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Fortnite 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
World of Tanks 27−30
−63%
40−45
+63%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Dota 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
World of Tanks 7−8
−129%
16−18
+129%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Valorant 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Elden Ring 0−1 1−2
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 2−3
Valorant 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R5 M420 and FirePro W2100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro W2100 is 86% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro W2100 is 100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the FirePro W2100 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • FirePro W2100 is ahead in 35 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 11 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 2.35
Recency 15 May 2016 12 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB

R5 M420 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FirePro W2100, on the other hand, has a 85% higher aggregate performance score.

The FirePro W2100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M420 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M420 is a notebook card while FirePro W2100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M420
Radeon R5 M420
AMD FirePro W2100
FirePro W2100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 107 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 94 votes

Rate FirePro W2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.