Pro Vega 20 vs R5 M335

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

R5 M335
1.41

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 870% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking951348
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.0214.41
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameExo XT DDR3Vega Mobile
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years old)15 November 2018 (5 years old)
Current price$891 $360
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 20 has 71950% better value for money than R5 M335.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3201280
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1070 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed1070 MHz1283 MHz
Number of transistors690 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown100 Watt
Texture fill rate21.40102.6
Floating-point performance684.8 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M335 and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1480 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M335 1.41
Pro Vega 20 13.67
+870%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 870% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M335 548
Pro Vega 20 5299
+867%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 867% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 M335 4772
Pro Vega 20 33590
+604%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 604% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 M335 1784
Pro Vega 20 12289
+589%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 589% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 M335 911
Pro Vega 20 9044
+893%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 893% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 M335 4590
Pro Vega 20 62318
+1258%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 1258% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

R5 M335 70485
Pro Vega 20 278586
+295%

Pro Vega 20 outperforms R5 M335 by 295% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD11
−455%
61
+455%
4K4−5
−925%
41
+925%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 27−30
Battlefield 5 0−1 74
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−571%
47
+571%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 27−30
Battlefield 5 0−1 63
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
Hitman 3 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−443%
38
+443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−733%
50
+733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 27−30
Battlefield 5 0−1 60
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4700%
45−50
+4700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−933%
31
+933%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hitman 3 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 10−11
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−240%
16−18
+240%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Hitman 3 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 7−8

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 6−7
Far Cry 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%

This is how R5 M335 and Pro Vega 20 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 455% faster than R5 M335

4K resolution:

  • Pro Vega 20 is 925% faster than R5 M335

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro Vega 20 is 4700% faster than the R5 M335.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro Vega 20 surpassed R5 M335 in all 32 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.41 13.67
Recency 16 June 2015 15 November 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Radeon Pro Vega 20 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M335 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M335 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M335
Radeon R5 M335
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 120 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R5 M335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 83 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.