Radeon HD 5570 vs R5 M330

Place in performance ranking	926	998
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	0.02
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code name	Exo Pro DDR3	Redwood
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	7 May 2015 (8 years old)	9 February 2010 (14 years old)
Current price	no data	$149

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	400
Compute units	5	no data
Core clock speed	1030 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1030 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	690 million	627 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	39 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	13.00
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops	520.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M330 and Radeon HD 5570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	165 mm
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1000 MHz	667 - 900 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.0
OpenGL	4.4	4.4
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	+	N/A
Mantle	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.54
+24.2%

ATI HD 5570 1.24

R5 M330 outperforms HD 5570 by 24% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M330 595
+23.7%

ATI HD 5570 481

R5 M330 outperforms HD 5570 by 24% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 M330 1689
+64.8%

ATI HD 5570 1025

R5 M330 outperforms HD 5570 by 65% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	18−20 +20%	15 −20%
Full HD	9 −144%	22 +144%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

+0%

4−5

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	1−2	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

This is how R5 M330 and ATI HD 5570 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

R5 M330 is 20% faster than ATI HD 5570

1080p resolution:

ATI HD 5570 is 144% faster than R5 M330

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 M330 is 100% faster than the ATI HD 5570.

All in all, in popular games:

R5 M330 is ahead in 11 tests (38%)
there's a draw in 18 tests (62%)

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	1.54	1.24
Recency	7 May 2015	9 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	18 Watt	39 Watt