Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs Radeon R5 M330

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M330 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

R5 M330
2015
4 GB DDR3, 18 Watt
1.54

T1000 Max-Q outperforms R5 M330 by a whopping 1026% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.9224.02
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameExoTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320896
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors690 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6075.60
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs2056

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan+1.2
Mantle+-
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.54
T1000 Max-Q 17.34
+1026%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M330 595
T1000 Max-Q 6691
+1025%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−1011%
100−110
+1011%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hitman 3 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−473%
85−90
+473%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1075%
45−50
+1075%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hitman 3 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−473%
85−90
+473%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−208%
40−45
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−550%
35−40
+550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2650%
110−120
+2650%
Hitman 3 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−473%
85−90
+473%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−150%
85−90
+150%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1467%
45−50
+1467%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 18−20
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−1213%
100−110
+1213%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−625%
27−30
+625%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 9−10
Far Cry 5 0−1 9−10

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how R5 M330 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 1011% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 2650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 49 tests (71%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (29%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.54 17.34
Recency 5 May 2015 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

R5 M330 has 177.8% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 1026% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1003 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.