GeForce 6600 vs Radeon R5 M330

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M330 with GeForce 6600, including specs and performance data.

R5 M330
2015
4 GB DDR3, 18 Watt
1.55
+605%

R5 M330 outperforms 6600 by a whopping 605% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9721373
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.94no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameExoNV43 A2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)12 August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed955 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million146 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate20.602.400
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.03.0
OpenGL4.42.1
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan+N/A
Mantle+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.55
+605%
GeForce 6600 0.22

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R5 M330 595
+592%
GeForce 6600 86

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
+800%
1−2
−800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Fortnite 7−8 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7 0−1
World of Tanks 30−35
+700%
4−5
−700%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Valorant 7−8 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3 0−1

This is how R5 M330 and GeForce 6600 compete in popular games:

  • R5 M330 is 800% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 0.22
Recency 5 May 2015 12 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

R5 M330 has a 604.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 292.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R5 M330 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M330 is a notebook card while GeForce 6600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
NVIDIA GeForce 6600
GeForce 6600

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 1034 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 279 votes

Rate GeForce 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.