GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile vs Radeon R5 M315
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon R5 M315 and GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms R5 M315 by a whopping 3286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1098 | 127 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 58.83 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | Meso | GB207 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) | 24 June 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2560 |
| Compute units | 5 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 970 MHz | 2235 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2520 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,550 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 23.28 | 201.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.745 TFLOPS | 12.9 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 24 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 96 KB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 128 KB | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| HD3D | + | - |
| PowerTune | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| ZeroCore | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | Not Listed | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.4 |
| Mantle | + | - |
| CUDA | - | 12.0 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−3900%
| 80
+3900%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−4200%
| 43
+4200%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2933%
|
90−95
+2933%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−1417%
|
90−95
+1417%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−13200%
|
130−140
+13200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2933%
|
90−95
+2933%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6100%
|
120−130
+6100%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8350%
|
160−170
+8350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2043%
|
150−160
+2043%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−12200%
|
120−130
+12200%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−1417%
|
90−95
+1417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1600%
|
150−160
+1600%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−588%
|
220−230
+588%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−13200%
|
130−140
+13200%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 27−30
−930%
|
270−280
+930%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2933%
|
90−95
+2933%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−3025%
|
500−550
+3025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6100%
|
120−130
+6100%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8350%
|
160−170
+8350%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2043%
|
150−160
+2043%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 1−2
−12200%
|
120−130
+12200%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 144 |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−1417%
|
90−95
+1417%
|
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−4550%
|
90−95
+4550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1600%
|
150−160
+1600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1871%
|
130−140
+1871%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−588%
|
220−230
+588%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−13200%
|
130−140
+13200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
−2933%
|
90−95
+2933%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−3025%
|
500−550
+3025%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−6100%
|
120−130
+6100%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−2043%
|
150−160
+2043%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
−1417%
|
90−95
+1417%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−1600%
|
150−160
+1600%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−1871%
|
130−140
+1871%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−3233%
|
1100−1150
+3233%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−8350%
|
160−170
+8350%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−3167%
|
95−100
+3167%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 7−8
−3786%
|
270−280
+3786%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 10−12
−3082%
|
350−400
+3082%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−8500%
|
250−260
+8500%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−9400%
|
95−100
+9400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−3600%
|
110−120
+3600%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
−4500%
|
45−50
+4500%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−3600%
|
70−75
+3600%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−5050%
|
100−110
+5050%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−460%
|
80−85
+460%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−3867%
|
230−240
+3867%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−2550%
|
50−55
+2550%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−2450%
|
50−55
+2450%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 94
+0%
|
94
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 100−105
+0%
|
100−105
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 60−65
+0%
|
60−65
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
This is how R5 M315 and RTX 5050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile is 3900% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5050 Mobile is 4200% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 5050 Mobile is 13200% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5050 Mobile performs better in 43 tests (75%)
- there's a draw in 14 tests (25%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.08 | 36.57 |
| Recency | 5 May 2015 | 24 June 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
RTX 5050 Mobile has a 3286.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M315 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
