GeForce 705M vs Radeon R5 M315
Aggregated performance score
Radeon R5 M315 outperforms GeForce 705M by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1006 | 1024 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | no data | 0.08 |
Architecture | GCN (2011−2017) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
GPU code name | Meso LE (DDR3) | GF119 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2015 (8 years ago) | 1 June 2013 (10 years ago) |
Current price | no data | $163 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 320 | 48 |
Compute units | 5 | no data |
Core clock speed | 970 MHz | 775 MHz |
Number of transistors | 1,550 million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 23.28 | 5.904 |
Floating-point performance | 745.0 gflops | 141.7 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on Radeon R5 M315 and GeForce 705M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Standard memory configuration | no data | DDR3 |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
eDP 1.2 signal support | no data | Up to 2560x1600 |
LVDS signal support | no data | Up to 1920x1200 |
VGA аnalog display support | no data | Up to 2048x1536 |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | no data | Up to 2560x1600 |
HDMI | no data | + |
HDCP content protection | no data | + |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | no data | + |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | no data | + |
Supported Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
AppAcceleration | - | no data |
Enduro | - | no data |
HD3D | + | no data |
PowerTune | + | no data |
DualGraphics | 1 | no data |
TrueAudio | - | no data |
ZeroCore | + | no data |
Switchable graphics | 1 | no data |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | no data | + |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | no data | + |
Optimus | no data | + |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12 API |
Shader Model | 6.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | Not Listed | 1.1 |
Vulkan | no data | N/A |
Mantle | + | no data |
CUDA | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon R5 M315 outperforms GeForce 705M by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
Radeon R5 M315 outperforms GeForce 705M by 4% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hitman 3 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R5 M315 is 100% faster than the GeForce 705M.
All in all, in popular games:
- R5 M315 is ahead in 2 tests (7%)
- there's a draw in 27 tests (93%)
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 1.22 | 1.18 |
Recency | 16 June 2015 | 1 June 2013 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R5 M315 and GeForce 705M.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.