GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs Radeon R5 M240

Place in performance ranking	1029	28
Place by popularity	not in top-100	25
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Ada Lovelace
GPU code name	Jet XT / Sun	AD106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2014 (9 years ago)	May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price	no data	$461

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	4352
Core clock speed	1030 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2535 MHz
Number of transistors	690 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	160 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.60	324.5
Floating-point performance	659.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M240 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	Not Listed	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	336 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 12-pin

Memory type	Not Listed	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	0 MB	16 GB
Memory bus width	Not Listed	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity	+	no data
HDMI	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	+	no data
Enduro	-	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	-	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	3.0
Vulkan	no data	1.3
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M240 1.16

RTX 4060 Ti 59.11
+4996%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Radeon R5 M240 by 4996% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M240 449

RTX 4060 Ti 22881
+4996%

GeForce RTX 4060 Ti outperforms Radeon R5 M240 by 4996% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−4900%

700−750
+4900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−4900%

150−160

+4900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −4900%	450−500 +4900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −4900%	450−500 +4900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4900%	200−210 +4900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4900%	200−210 +4900%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Hitman 3	3−4 −4900%	150−160 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −4900%	400−450 +4900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −4900%	250−260 +4900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −4900%	100−105 +4900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Hitman 3	1−2 −4900%	50−55 +4900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −4900%	350−400 +4900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1