GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Radeon R5 M240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 A230 R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M435DX
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 630 OEM GT 640 GT 640 OEM GT 720 OEM GT 730 OEM GT 740 GT 1030 GK107 GTX 650

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 M240 with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

R5 M240
2014
0 MB Not Listed
1.12

630 OEM outperforms R5 M240 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 M240 R5 M240
GT 630 OEM GT 630 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1116993
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.45
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameJetGK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 September 2014 (11 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320192
Core clock speed1000 MHz875 MHz
Number of transistors690 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6014.00
Floating-point processing power0.6592 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2016
L1 Cache80 KB16 KB
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportNot Listedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedDDR3
Maximum RAM amount0 MB1 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data891 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Eyefinity+-
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
Mantle+-
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−31.3%
21−24
+31.3%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Valorant 30−35
−40.6%
45−50
+40.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Valorant 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Valorant 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how R5 M240 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • GT 630 OEM is 29% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.12 1.59
Recency 18 September 2014 24 April 2012

R5 M240 has an age advantage of 2 years.

GT 630 OEM, on the other hand, has a 42% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GT 630 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M240 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 M240
Radeon R5 M240
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 M240 Radeon R5 M240
vs
GT 540M GeForce GT 540M
GT 630 OEM GeForce GT 630 OEM
vs
ATI HD 2900 XT Radeon HD 2900 XT
R5 M240 Radeon R5 M240
vs
R5 M320 Radeon R5 M320
GT 720M GT 720M
vs
GMA X3100 GMA X3100
GT 720M GT 720M
vs
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
GT 720M GT 720M
vs
CMP 50HX CMP 50HX
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 GTX SLI
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
ATI Mobility X1350 Mobility X1350
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
9500 GT 9500 GT
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
8600 GS 8600 GS
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
GTX 1050 3 GB GTX 1050 3 GB
R5 M240 R5 M240
vs
6150 LE 6150 LE

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 56 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 or GeForce GT 630 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.