GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs Radeon R5 M230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1147not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameJetC79
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2014 (11 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3208
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed825 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown12 Watt
Texture fill rate17.103.600
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPS0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs208
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1111.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R5 M230 has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M230 and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M230
Radeon R5 M230
NVIDIA GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M230 or GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.