ATI FireGL T2-64S vs Radeon R5 M230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameJetRV350
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2014 (11 years ago)1 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320no data
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed825 MHz324 MHz
Boost clock speed855 MHzno data
Number of transistors690 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate17.101.296
Floating-point processing power0.5472 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs204
L1 Cache80 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz203 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s6.496 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x LFH60
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 119.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCLNot ListedN/A
Vulkan-N/A
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2014 1 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm

R5 M230 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M230 and FireGL T2-64S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M230 is a notebook graphics card while FireGL T2-64S is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M230
Radeon R5 M230
ATI FireGL T2-64S
FireGL T2-64S

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 190 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL T2-64S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M230 or FireGL T2-64S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.