GeForce 8800 GTS 112 vs Radeon R5 (Carrizo)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking990not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.74no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameCarrizoG80
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date4 June 2015 (10 years ago)19 November 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256112
Core clock speedno data500 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHzno data
Number of transistors2410 Million681 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPsno data20
TMUsno data28
L2 Cacheno data80 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data640 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2015 19 November 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 150 Watt

R5 (Carrizo) has an age advantage of 7 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 1150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Carrizo) and GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Carrizo) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 6 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Carrizo) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.1 310 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Carrizo) or GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.