Iris Pro Graphics P555 vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking913not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.82no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameBristol RidgeSkylake GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speedno data350 MHz
Boost clock speed800 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors3100 Million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)12-45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.768 TFLOPS
ROPsno data6
TMUsno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64/128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2016 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

R5 (Bristol Ridge) has an age advantage of 9 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

Iris Pro Graphics P555, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and Iris Pro Graphics P555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is a notebook graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P555 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) or Iris Pro Graphics P555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.