Iris Pro Graphics P555 vs Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameMarsSkylake GT3e
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date10 January 2014 (12 years ago)1 September 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed650 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed700 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors950 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.8048.00
Floating-point processing power0.5376 TFLOPS0.768 TFLOPS
ROPs86
TMUs2448
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.97

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 January 2014 1 September 2015
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Iris Pro Graphics P555 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand and Iris Pro Graphics P555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand is a notebook graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics P555 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P555
Iris Pro Graphics P555

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 8 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Iris Pro Graphics P555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 M240 Rebrand or Iris Pro Graphics P555, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.