FirePro W4190M vs Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

Place in performance ranking	797	734
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	no data	0.02
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	Bristol Ridge	Mars XTX?
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 June 2016 (7 years old)	12 November 2015 (8 years old)
Current price	$53	$4205

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	384
Core clock speed	no data	825 MHz
Boost clock speed	800 MHz	900 MHz
Number of transistors	3100 Million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12-45 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	no data	21.60
Floating-point performance	no data	691.2 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and FirePro W4190M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	64 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration

no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 2.44

W4190M 3.00
+23%

FirePro W4190M outperforms Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 23% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1720

W4190M 2351
+36.7%

FirePro W4190M outperforms Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 37% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 1284

W4190M 1745
+36%

FirePro W4190M outperforms Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 36% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 (Bristol Ridge) 8256

W4190M 12317
+49.2%

FirePro W4190M outperforms Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) by 49% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

12
+9.1%

−9.1%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−20%

6−7
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	11 +37.5%	8−9 −37.5%
Hitman 3	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Hitman 3	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	2−3

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Hitman 3	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

This is how R5 (Bristol Ridge) and W4190M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 9.1% faster than W4190M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the R5 (Bristol Ridge) is 37.5% faster than the W4190M.
in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the W4190M is 100% faster than the R5 (Bristol Ridge).

All in all, in popular games: