Radeon Steam Deck 8CU vs R5 430 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 8570 OEM HD 8670 OEM R5 240 OEM R5 340 OEM R5 340X OEM R5 430 OEM R5 A240 R7 240 R7 250 R7 340 OEM R7 350X OEM R7 430 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics (Ryzen 7000) Steam Deck 8CU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 430 OEM with Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, including specs and performance data.

R5 430 OEM
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.45

Steam Deck 8CU outperforms R5 430 OEM by a whopping 315% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 430 OEM R5 430 OEM
Steam Deck 8CU Steam Deck 8CU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking873480
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)RDNA 2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameOlandRDNA 2 Sephiroth
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)9 November 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384512
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed780 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.72no data
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache96 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB1 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1150 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−383%
29
+383%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how R5 430 OEM and Steam Deck 8CU compete in popular games:

  • Steam Deck 8CU is 383% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.45 10.17
Recency 30 June 2016 9 November 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

Steam Deck 8CU has a 315.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 430 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Steam Deck 8CU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
AMD Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
Steam Deck 8CU Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
Radeon 610 Radeon 610
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
Arc 7 A780 Arc 7 A780
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
Arc A310 Arc A310
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
vs
ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition Radeon 9000 PRO Mac Edition
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
vs
GTX 260 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
vs
Radeon 630 Radeon 630
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
vs
A100 SXM4 A100 SXM4
R7 430 OEM Radeon R7 430 OEM
vs
Arc 7 A780 Arc 7 A780

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 478 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon Steam Deck 8CU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 430 OEM or Radeon Steam Deck 8CU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.