Radeon RX 8050S vs R5 430 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD 8570 OEM HD 8670 OEM R5 240 OEM R5 340 OEM R5 340X OEM R5 430 OEM R5 A240 R7 240 R7 250 R7 340 OEM R7 350X OEM R7 430 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5500M 6500M 6550M 6600M 6800M 7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 8040S 8050S 8060S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 430 OEM with Radeon RX 8050S, including specs and performance data.

R5 430 OEM
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
2.43

8050S outperforms R5 430 OEM by a whopping 1369% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 430 OEM R5 430 OEM
RX 8050S RX 8050S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking874151
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.78no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)no data
GPU code nameOlandno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 June 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed730 MHzno data
Boost clock speed780 MHz2800 MHz
Number of transistors950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.72no data
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1150 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−1467%
94
+1467%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 96
+0%
96
+0%
Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 118
+0%
118
+0%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92
+0%
92
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how R5 430 OEM and RX 8050S compete in popular games:

  • RX 8050S is 1467% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.43 35.70
Recency 30 June 2016 6 January 2025

RX 8050S has a 1369.1% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 8 years.

The Radeon RX 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 430 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 430 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 8050S is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
AMD Radeon RX 8050S
Radeon RX 8050S
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4850 Radeon HD 4850
RX 8050S Radeon RX 8050S
vs
RTX 2080 Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
R5 430 OEM Radeon R5 430 OEM
vs
HD 6750 Radeon HD 6750
R5 430 OEM AMD R5 430 OEM
vs
HD 7650M Rebrand 7650M Rebrand
R5 430 OEM AMD R5 430 OEM
vs
HD 6770M Mac Edition 6770M Mac Edition
R5 430 OEM AMD R5 430 OEM
vs
HD 6630M Mac Edition 6630M Mac Edition
R5 430 OEM AMD R5 430 OEM
vs
RX 6700M 6700M
R5 430 OEM AMD R5 430 OEM
vs
RTX 4090 4090
R5 435 OEM AMD R5 435 OEM
vs
PlayStation 4 GPU GPU
R7 430 OEM AMD R7 430 OEM
vs
ATI 7000 7000
R7 430 OEM AMD R7 430 OEM
vs
RX 5700M 5700M
R7 430 OEM AMD R7 430 OEM
vs
Pro 5300M 5300M
R7 430 OEM AMD R7 430 OEM
vs
RX 6900 6900

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 479 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 430 OEM or Radeon RX 8050S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.