Quadro NVS 510M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

Place in performance ranking	771	1144
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	0.01
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)	Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code name	Oland	G71
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 June 2016 (7 years ago)	21 August 2006 (17 years ago)
Current price	no data	$105

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	730 MHz	450 MHz
Boost clock speed	780 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	950 million	278 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.72	10.80
Floating-point performance	599.0 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 430 OEM and Quadro NVS 510M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth	36.8 GB/s	19.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 430 OEM 2.66
+309%

NVS 510M 0.65

Radeon R5 430 OEM outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 309% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 430 OEM 1031
+308%

NVS 510M 253

Radeon R5 430 OEM outperforms Quadro NVS 510M by 308% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.66	0.65
Recency	30 June 2016	21 August 2006
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	35 Watt