Tesla V100 SXM2 vs Radeon R5 340X OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameOlandGV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed900 MHz1370 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate21.60438.4
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8128
TMUs24320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1758 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s900.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 May 2015 21 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 250 Watt

R5 340X OEM has 284.6% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SXM2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 340X OEM and Tesla V100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R5 340X OEM is a desktop card while Tesla V100 SXM2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 340X OEM
Radeon R5 340X OEM
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2
Tesla V100 SXM2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 468 votes

Rate Radeon R5 340X OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 44 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.