ATI Video Xpression+ vs Radeon R5 430 OEM

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking801not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.70no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameOlandMach64
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 June 2016 (8 years ago)1 May 1996 (28 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed730 MHz62 MHz
Boost clock speed780 MHzno data
Number of transistors950 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Wattno data
Texture fill rate18.72no data
Floating-point processing power0.599 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5EDO
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1150 MHz62 MHz
Memory bandwidth36.8 GB/s496.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 June 2016 1 May 1996
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 600 nm

R5 430 OEM has an age advantage of 20 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R5 430 OEM and Video Xpression+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon R5 430 OEM
ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 358 votes

Rate Radeon R5 430 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.