ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs R5 230

#ad 
Buy Radeon R5 230
Radeon HD 6450 Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5 Radeon HD 7450 OEM Radeon HD 7470 OEM Radeon HD 8450 OEM Radeon HD 8470 OEM Radeon HD 8490 OEM Radeon R5 230 Radeon R5 235 OEM Radeon R5 235X OEM Radeon R5 310 OEM Radeon R5 A220
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 550v Mobility Radeon HD 560v Mobility Radeon HD 565v Mobility Radeon HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 5165

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R5 230 with Mobility Radeon HD 4670, including specs and performance data.

R5 230
2014
4 GB DDR3, 19 Watt
0.53

ATI Mobility HD 4670 outperforms R5 230 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
R5 230 R5 230
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility HD 4670

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12311074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.042.34
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameCaicosM96
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date3 April 2014 (11 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores160320
Core clock speedno data675 MHz
Number of transistors370 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.00021.60
Floating-point processing power0.2 TFLOPS0.432 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 1.0 x4no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsN/Ano data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data800 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.67 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGANo outputs
Eyefinity+-
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire+-
​PowerPlay+no data
DDMA audio-no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1110.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.04.1
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.53 1.12
Recency 3 April 2014 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 35 Watt

R5 230 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

ATI Mobility HD 4670, on the other hand, has a 111.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 230 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 230 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon R5 230
Radeon R5 230
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

R5 230 Radeon R5 230
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
ATI Mobility HD 4670 Mobility Radeon HD 4670
vs
HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics Radeon HD 7500G + HD 7550M Dual Graphics
R5 230 Radeon R5 230
vs
7600 GT GeForce 7600 GT
R9 285 AMD R9 285
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 Graphics 6100
R9 285 AMD R9 285
vs
GTX 560 560
R9 285 AMD R9 285
vs
P30PH
R7 250XE AMD R7 250XE
vs
RX 5800 XT 5800 XT
R9 295X2 AMD R9 295X2
vs
RX 560 560
R5 230 AMD R5 230
vs
ATI HD 2600 XT 2600 XT
R9 280 AMD R9 280
vs
K5100M K5100M
R9 280 AMD R9 280
vs
GTX 960M 960M
R9 280 AMD R9 280
vs
GeForce 945M 945M
R9 280 AMD R9 280
vs
GT 635M 635M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 250 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 13 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R5 230 or Mobility Radeon HD 4670, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.