Radeon Pro Vega II vs R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Place in the ranking	1070	100
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	16.36
Power efficiency	5.36	5.85
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Stoney Ridge	Vega 20
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$2,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4096
Core clock speed	no data	1574 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	1720 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	475 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	440.3
Floating-point processing power	no data	14.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	Apple MPX
Width	no data	Quad-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	no data	32 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	806 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	825.3 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.0b, 4x Thunderbolt
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−3233%

300−350
+3233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

7.33

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−3233%

100−105

+3233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3233%	200−210 +3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −3114%	450−500 +3114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −3275%	270−280 +3275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3338%	1100−1150 +3338%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3233%	200−210 +3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −3114%	450−500 +3114%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −3275%	270−280 +3275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −3082%	350−400 +3082%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3338%	1100−1150 +3338%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3233%	100−105 +3233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Hitman 3	6−7 −3233%	200−210 +3233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −3114%	450−500 +3114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −3275%	270−280 +3275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −3082%	350−400 +3082%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −3338%	1100−1150 +3338%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3150%

65−70
+3150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −3150%	65−70 +3150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Hitman 3	7−8 −3329%	240−250 +3329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −3150%	130−140 +3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −3300%	170−180 +3300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5
−3150%

130−140

+3150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3150%

65−70
+3150%

This is how R4 (Stoney Ridge) and Pro Vega II compete in popular games:

Pro Vega II is 3233% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.17	40.49
Recency	1 June 2016	3 June 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	475 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

Pro Vega II, on the other hand, has a 3360.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro Vega II is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while Radeon Pro Vega II is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.