ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs R4 (Stoney Ridge)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) with Radeon HD 4250, including specs and performance data.

R4 (Stoney Ridge)
2016
15 Watt
1.17
+266%

R4 (Stoney Ridge) outperforms ATI HD 4250 by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10731317
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.360.88
ArchitectureGCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameStoney RidgeRV620
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)25 February 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19240
Core clock speedno data594 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data181 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.376
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04752 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.336 GB/s
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R4 (Stoney Ridge) 1.17
+266%
ATI HD 4250 0.32

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R4 (Stoney Ridge) 2542
+1020%
ATI HD 4250 227

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+300%
2−3
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5
+25%
4−5
−25%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Fortnite 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
World of Tanks 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how R4 (Stoney Ridge) and ATI HD 4250 compete in popular games:

  • R4 (Stoney Ridge) is 300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the R4 (Stoney Ridge) is 250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R4 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 25 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.32
Recency 1 June 2016 25 February 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

R4 (Stoney Ridge) has a 265.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4250 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4250 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
ATI Radeon HD 4250
Radeon HD 4250

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 123 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 83 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.