GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)

Place in the ranking	1072	676
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.37	5.99
Architecture	GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Stoney Ridge	GK107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)	8 November 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	384
Core clock speed	no data	926 MHz
Boost clock speed	600 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	no data	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	29.63
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.7112 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

no data

PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	no data	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	1254 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	80.26 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (FL 12_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	no data	5.1
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.1.126
CUDA	-	3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R4 (Stoney Ridge) 1.17

GT 750M Mac Edition 4.35
+272%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

R4 (Stoney Ridge) 2542

GT 750M Mac Edition 10049
+295%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R4 (Stoney Ridge) 583

GT 750M Mac Edition 1837
+215%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−238%

27−30
+238%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5 −260%	18−20 +260%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Fortnite	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
Grand Theft Auto V	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
World of Tanks	24−27 −265%	95−100 +265%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −246%	45−50 +246%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Valorant	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Dota 2	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Valorant	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%