UHD Graphics vs Radeon R4 (Beema)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R4 (Beema) and UHD Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R4 (Beema)
2014
1.03

UHD Graphics outperforms R4 (Beema) by a whopping 442% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1096601
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Power efficiencyno data38.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameBeemaJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)11 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128256
Core clock speed800 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R4 (Beema) 1.03
UHD Graphics 5.58
+442%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R4 (Beema) 399
UHD Graphics 2151
+439%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−400%
40−45
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

This is how R4 (Beema) and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.03 5.58
Recency 29 April 2014 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has a 441.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R4 (Beema) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 74 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6057 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.