ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP vs R4 (Beema)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R4 (Beema) with Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, including specs and performance data.

R4 (Beema)
2014
0.90
+260%

R4 (Beema) outperforms ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11531396
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.57
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBeemaRV630
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (11 years ago)28 June 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128120
Core clock speed800 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistorsno data390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.752
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1426 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR2
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data396 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data12.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R4 (Beema) 0.90
+260%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP 0.25

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R4 (Beema) 399
+263%
ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP Samples: 12 110

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
+300%
2−3
−300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Valorant 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 22
+267%
6−7
−267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 30−35
+288%
8−9
−288%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2 0−1

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Valorant 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

This is how R4 (Beema) and ATI HD 2600 PRO AGP compete in popular games:

  • R4 (Beema) is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.90 0.25
Recency 29 April 2014 28 June 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm

R4 (Beema) has a 260% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon R4 (Beema) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R4 (Beema) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
Radeon R4 (Beema)
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 74 votes

Rate Radeon R4 (Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 14 votes

Rate Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R4 (Beema) or Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.