GeForce 9500 GT vs Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.71
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameBeemaG96
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 January 2015 (11 years ago)29 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$85.99

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12832
Core clock speed351 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors930 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate2.8089.600
Floating-point processing power0.08986 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data175 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 (GDDR3) and 500 (DDR2) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 (GDDR3) and 16.0 (DDR2)
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.34.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 January 2015 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

R3E Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

9500 GT, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics and GeForce 9500 GT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 9500 GT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1394 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R3E Mobile Graphics or GeForce 9500 GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.