ATI Xbox 360 GPU vs Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1135not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.1 (2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameBeema/MullinsXenos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)22 November 2005 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128240
Core clock speed350 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed686 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data232 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Texture fill rateno data8.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.24 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (FL 12_0)9.0c (9_3)
OpenGLno dataN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 April 2014 22 November 2005
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm

R3 (Mullins/Beema) has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) and Xbox 360 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) is a notebook card while Xbox 360 GPU is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
ATI Xbox 360 GPU
Xbox 360 GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 28 votes

Rate Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 117 votes

Rate Xbox 360 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.