Arc A730M vs Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.53
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameBeemaDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date28 January 2015 (10 years ago)2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283072
Core clock speed497 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors930 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate3.976393.6
Floating-point processing power0.1272 TFLOPS12.6 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data336.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Arc A730M has a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics and Arc A730M. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics
Intel Arc A730M
Arc A730M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 61 votes

Rate Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 115 votes

Rate Arc A730M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics or Arc A730M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.