Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs Pro WX 8200

Place in performance ranking	122	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	85
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.38	28.06
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	RDNA 3
GPU code name	Vega 10	Navi 31 XTX
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	$999
Current price	$2172 (2.2x MSRP)	$859 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XTX has 170% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	6144
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	2270 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	355 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	959.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	287 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	960.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.82

RX 7900 XTX 79.98
+123%

RX 7900 XTX outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 8200 13835

RX 7900 XTX 30891
+123%

RX 7900 XTX outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 123% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 −124%	246 +124%
1440p	75−80 −132%	174 +132%
4K	50−55 −124%	112 +124%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

100−105

−142%

242
+142%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 −137%	166 +137%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120−130 −136%	283 +136%
Battlefield 5	100−105 −144%	240−250 +144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−105 −131%	231 +131%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −136%	110−120 +136%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −123%	200−210 +123%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 −125%	338 +125%
Hitman 3	55−60 −124%	120−130 +124%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 −124%	537 +124%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −128%	140−150 +128%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −125%	120−130 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	270−280 −124%	604 +124%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85−90 −127%	193 +127%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65−70 −132%	151 +132%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100−105 −141%	241 +141%
Battlefield 5	100−105 −144%	240−250 +144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	90−95 −131%	208 +131%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −136%	110−120 +136%
Far Cry New Dawn	90−95 −123%	200−210 +123%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −145%	240−250 +145%
Hitman 3	55−60 −124%	120−130 +124%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −125%	300−350 +125%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −131%	81 +131%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 −125%	120−130 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	230−240 −133%	535 +133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 −127%	545 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −138%	140−150 +138%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 −123%	134 +123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	90−95 −133%	210 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −140%	120−130 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −134%	199 +134%
Far Cry 5	50−55 −136%	110−120 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 −127%	295 +127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180−190 −126%	406 +126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	210−220 −124%	471 +124%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 −129%	298 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −126%	158 +126%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−125%

120−130

+125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 −137%	160−170 +137%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −140%	140−150 +140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 −140%	132 +140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	75−80 −128%	171 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −124%	110−120 +124%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −135%	141 +135%
Far Cry 5	80−85 −134%	187 +134%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 −142%	290 +142%
Hitman 3	50−55 −136%	110−120 +136%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140−150 −134%	328 +134%
Metro Exodus	65−70 −125%	146 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 −125%	360 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 −138%	238 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −137%	154 +137%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

55−60
−125%

120−130

+125%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −151%	85−90 +151%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −130%	65−70 +130%
Hitman 3	30−33 −143%	70−75 +143%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −138%	130−140 +138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −123%	134 +123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85 −128%	182 +128%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −144%	110 +144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 −138%	107 +138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −148%	50−55 +148%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −137%	71 +137%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −138%	50−55 +138%
Forza Horizon 4	100−105 −127%	227 +127%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 −128%	205 +128%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −133%	140 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −129%	103 +129%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−138%

95−100
+138%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RX 7900 XTX compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XTX is 124% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XTX is 132% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XTX is 124% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.82	79.98
Recency	13 August 2018	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	355 Watt