Radeon RX 7600M vs Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with Radeon RX 7600M, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018, $999
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
30.11
+14.5%

Pro 8200 outperforms 7600M by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200
RX 7600M RX 7600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.65no data
Power efficiency10.0822.50
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameVega 10Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841792
Core clock speed1200 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz2410 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0269.9
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs224112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache896 KB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 8200 30.11
+14.5%
RX 7600M 26.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 12578
+14.4%
Samples: 106
RX 7600M 10999
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+13.1%
84
−13.1%
1440p45−50
+4.7%
43
−4.7%
4K24−27
+4.3%
23
−4.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.52no data
1440p22.20no data
4K41.63no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 138
+0%
138
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
+0%
94
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 8200 is 13% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 8200 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 8200 is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.11 26.30
Recency 13 August 2018 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 90 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has a 14% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 7600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 156% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Arc Pro B50 Arc Pro B50
ATI X1600 XT Dual Radeon X1600 XT Dual
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell PRO 6000 Blackwell
ATI X1600 XT Dual Radeon X1600 XT Dual
vs
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
x2 MMS
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU Max 24-Core GPU
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Apple M4 Max 32-Core GPU Max 32-Core GPU
GTX 470 PhysX Edition GeForce GTX 470 PhysX Edition
vs
Arctic Sound-M Sound M
RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Max-Q
vs
GTX 470 PhysX Edition 470 PhysX Edition
GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 750 Ti OEM
vs
GTX 1660 Mobile 1660 Mobile
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM 750 Ti OEM

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or Radeon RX 7600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.