Pro WX 8200 vs Pro Vega II

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 2963$
Games supported 99%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1200 MHz
  • Max video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type HBM2
  • Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
Radeon Pro Vega II
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1574 MHz
  • Max video memory 32 GB
  • Memory type HBM2
  • Memory clock speed 1612 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 9999$
Games supported 99%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating8266
Value for money3.400.17
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 20
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (4 years ago)3 June 2019 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$2963 (3x MSRP)$9999
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1574 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1720 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)230 Watt475 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0440.3

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotQuad-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1612 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s825.3 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI, 4x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 47.13
Pro Vega II 50.03
+6.2%
  • Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

Pro WX 8200 13882
Pro Vega II 14737
+6.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Popular games

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 47.13 50.03
Novelty 13 August 2018 3 June 2019
Memory bus width 2048 4096
Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 4096
Memory bandwidth 512 825.3
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 230 Watt 475 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

and

AMD Radeon Pro Vega II
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon Pro WX 8200 by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon Pro WX 8200's NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro P6000, which is faster by 7% and higher by 18 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro WX 8200:

Competitors of Radeon Pro Vega II by NVIDIA

The nearest Radeon Pro Vega II's NVIDIA equivalent is Quadro P6000, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro Vega II:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 56 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.