Pro Vega 64X vs Pro WX 8200

Price now 2171$
Games supported 98%
Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1200 MHz
  • Max video memory 8 GB
  • Memory type HBM2
  • Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1250 MHz
  • Max video memory 16 GB
  • Memory type HBM2
  • Memory clock speed 2000 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 366$
Games supported 98%

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9887
Value for money5.6639.07
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameVega 10Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (4 years old)19 March 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data
Current price$2171 (2.2x MSRP)$366
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35844096
Core clock speed1200 MHz1250 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0375.8

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone


Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.31
Pro Vega 64X 37.10

Pro Vega 64X outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 5% in our combined benchmark results.


This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 24%

Pro WX 8200 13925
Pro Vega 64X 14630

Pro Vega 64X outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating 35.31 37.10
Recency 13 August 2018 19 March 2019
Pipelines / CUDA cores 3584 4096
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X. The differences in performance seem too small.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your own vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 12 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 24 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.