Radeon Pro Vega 64X vs Pro WX 8200

Place in performance ranking	126	115
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	10.08	70.41
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Vega 10	Vega 10
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	19 March 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$2172 (2.2x MSRP)	$366

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 64X has 599% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	4096
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1250 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1468 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	336.0	375.8

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Radeon Pro Vega 64X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.1.125

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.97

Pro Vega 64X 37.77
+5%

Pro Vega 64X outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 8200 13931

Pro Vega 64X 14630
+5%

Pro Vega 64X outperforms Pro WX 8200 by 5% in Passmark.