Quadro RTX A6000 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 and Quadro RTX A6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
34.40

RTX A6000 outperforms Pro WX 8200 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15138
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.8810.80
Power efficiency10.3013.45
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)5 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $4,649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 8200 has 130% better value for money than RTX A6000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358410752
Core clock speed1200 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0604.8
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS38.71 TFLOPS
ROPs64112
TMUs224336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB48 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 34.40
RTX A6000 58.62
+70.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 13224
RTX A6000 22535
+70.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
−75%
175
+75%
1440p75−80
−72%
129
+72%
4K65−70
−75.4%
114
+75.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.99
+166%
26.57
−166%
1440p13.32
+171%
36.04
−171%
4K15.37
+165%
40.78
−165%
  • Pro WX 8200 has 166% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro WX 8200 has 171% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • Pro WX 8200 has 165% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Elden Ring 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300
+0%
300
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+0%
66
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Elden Ring 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Fortnite 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 293
+0%
293
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 128
+0%
128
+0%
Metro Exodus 78
+0%
78
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 288
+0%
288
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 96
+0%
96
+0%
Elden Ring 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 96
+0%
96
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
World of Tanks 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 247
+0%
247
+0%
Metro Exodus 63
+0%
63
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Elden Ring 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 155
+0%
155
+0%
Metro Exodus 70
+0%
70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 155
+0%
155
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 149
+0%
149
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RTX A6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX A6000 is 75% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A6000 is 72% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A6000 is 75% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.40 58.62
Recency 13 August 2018 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 300 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has 30.4% lower power consumption.

RTX A6000, on the other hand, has a 70.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX A6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 8200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 479 votes

Rate Quadro RTX A6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.