Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018, $999
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
30.16
+319%

Pro 8200 outperforms Graphics G7 80EUs by a whopping 319% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking209584
Place by popularitynot in top-10093
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.01no data
Power efficiency10.0719.72
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega 10Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 August 2018 (7 years ago)15 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores358480
Core clock speed1200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0no data
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs224no data
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width2048 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.1.125-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+317%
18
−317%
1440p35−40
+289%
9
−289%
4K55−60
+293%
14
−293%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.32no data
1440p28.54no data
4K18.16no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 31
+0%
31
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12
+0%
12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Dota 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 12
+0%
12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 8200 is 317% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 8200 is 289% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 8200 is 293% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 69 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.16 7.19
Recency 13 August 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 28 Watt

Pro WX 8200 has a 319.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 721.4% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
GTX 860M GeForce GTX 860M
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro 5700 XT Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
ATI FireGL 9700 X1-256 9700 X1-256
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 G7
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 G4
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs G7 96EUs
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU G7 96EU
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile G4 48EU Mobile
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU 14-Core GPU
GTX 470 PhysX Edition NVIDIA GTX 470 PhysX Edition
vs
HD 6970 X2 6970 X2
GTX 470 PhysX Edition NVIDIA GTX 470 PhysX Edition
vs
HD 6250 IGP 6250 IGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 29 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1098 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.