GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Instinct MI25 Pro V320 Pro V320 MxGPU Pro V340 Pro V340 8 GB Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 MxGPU Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 PRO WX 9100 Vega Frontier Edition Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3060 3060 8 GB 3060 8 GB GA104 3060 12 GB GA104 3060 3840SP 3060 GA104 3060 GDDR6X 3060 Ti 3060 Ti GA103 3060 Ti GDDR6X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 8200 with GeForce RTX 3060, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 8200
2018
8 GB HBM2, 230 Watt
29.79

RTX 3060 outperforms Pro WX 8200 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 8200
RTX 3060 RTX 3060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking195104
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.8263.90
Power efficiency10.0518.30
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameVega 10GA106
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date13 August 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 3060 has 624% better value for money than Pro WX 8200.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843584
Core clock speed1200 MHz1320 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1777 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt170 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0199.0
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS12.74 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs224112
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm242 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s360.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 8200 29.79
RTX 3060 40.15
+34.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 8200 12805
RTX 3060 17256
+34.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
−41.3%
113
+41.3%
1440p45−50
−42.2%
64
+42.2%
4K30−35
−40%
42
+40%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.49
−329%
2.91
+329%
1440p22.20
−332%
5.14
+332%
4K33.30
−325%
7.83
+325%
  • RTX 3060 has 329% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 has 332% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 has 325% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Far Cry 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 81
+0%
81
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 179
+0%
179
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 64
+0%
64
+0%
Dota 2 147
+0%
147
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Sons of the Forest 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+0%
81
+0%
Metro Exodus 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Sons of the Forest 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 82
+0%
82
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+0%
65
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Sons of the Forest 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Pro WX 8200 and RTX 3060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 is 41% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3060 is 42% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3060 is 40% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 29.79 40.15
Recency 13 August 2018 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 170 Watt

RTX 3060 has a 34.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 35.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8200 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Quadro P5000 Quadro P5000
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
Pro WX 8200 Radeon Pro WX 8200
vs
Pro VII Radeon Pro VII
GTX 1170 NVIDIA 1170
vs
RTX 3060 3060
GTX 780 Ti 6 GB NVIDIA GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
vs
RX 580 2048SP 580 2048SP
Instinct Vega Radeon Instinct Vega
vs
Jetson Xavier NX GPU Xavier NX GPU
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 8000 8000
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 5000 5000
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RX 6700 XT 6700 XT
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RX 6600 6600
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A2000 A2000
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX A2000 12 GB 12 GB
Pro WX 8200 AMD Pro WX 8200
vs
RTX 4060 4060

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 32823 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8200 or GeForce RTX 3060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.