GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q vs Radeon Pro WX 8100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-10088
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameVega 10AD107
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date3 December 2017 (7 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842560
Core clock speed1200 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz1605 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate336.0128.4
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS8.218 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs22480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache896 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache4 MB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2017 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 35 Watt

Pro WX 8100 has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 557.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8100 and GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 126 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8100 or GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.