GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 vs Radeon Pro WX 8100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameVega 10GF114
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date3 December 2017 (7 years ago)15 November 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584288
Core clock speed1200 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistors12,500 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate336.031.20
Floating-point processing power10.75 TFLOPS0.7488 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs22448
L1 Cache896 KB384 KB
L2 Cache4 MB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm210 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB768 MB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s81.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.1.125N/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 December 2017 15 November 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 768 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 150 Watt

Pro WX 8100 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 460 SE v2, on the other hand, has 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro WX 8100 and GeForce GTX 460 SE v2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 8100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 8100
Radeon Pro WX 8100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
GeForce GTX 460 SE v2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 SE v2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 8100 or GeForce GTX 460 SE v2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.