Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Plus Graphics G4 Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Plus Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Plus Graphics G5 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Plus Graphics G7 Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Plus Graphics G7 64EU Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016, $799
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
18.40
+395%

Pro 7100 outperforms Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) by a whopping 395% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 7100
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.18no data
Power efficiency10.8811.43
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameEllesmereIce Lake G4 Gen. 11
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)28 May 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230448
Core clock speed1188 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0no data
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs144no data
L1 Cache576 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD80−85
+371%
17
−371%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+607%
14−16
−607%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 75−80
+457%
14
−457%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+607%
14−16
−607%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+455%
11
−455%
Fortnite 100−105
+733%
12
−733%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
Valorant 140−150
+173%
50−55
−173%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 75−80
+500%
13
−500%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+607%
14−16
−607%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+516%
37
−516%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Dota 2 100−110
+500%
18
−500%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+510%
10
−510%
Fortnite 100−105
+733%
12
−733%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
+490%
10−11
−490%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+678%
9
−678%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+471%
7−8
−471%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+300%
13
−300%
Valorant 140−150
+173%
50−55
−173%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+550%
12
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+400%
8−9
−400%
Dota 2 100−110
+440%
20
−440%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+578%
9
−578%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+322%
18−20
−322%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+344%
16−18
−344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+643%
7
−643%
Valorant 140−150
+173%
50−55
−173%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−105
+1329%
7
−1329%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+386%
27−30
−386%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+448%
30−35
−448%
Valorant 170−180
+366%
35−40
−366%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+500%
7−8
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+514%
7−8
−514%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+127%
14−16
−127%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Valorant 100−110
+458%
18−20
−458%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Dota 2 65−70
+442%
12−14
−442%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+725%
4−5
−725%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 371% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 1550% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro WX 7100 surpassed Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in all 58 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 18.40 3.72
Recency 10 November 2016 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 12 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 394.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
Pro WX 7100 Radeon Pro WX 7100
vs
T1000 T1000
VIA UniChrome Pro
vs
Sky 500 500
VIA UniChrome Pro
vs
FirePro R5000 R5000
VIA UniChrome Pro
vs
W5000 DVI W5000 DVI
VIA UniChrome Pro
vs
FirePro W4000 W4000
Pro WX 7100 AMD Pro WX 7100
vs
GTX 950 950
Pro WX 7100 AMD Pro WX 7100
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Max-Q
Pro WX 7100 AMD Pro WX 7100
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU 40-Core GPU
Pro WX 4150 AMD Pro WX 4150
vs
HD Graphics 620 620
Pro WX 4150 AMD Pro WX 4150
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 Mac Edition 440 Mac Edition
Pro WX 4150 AMD Pro WX 4150
vs
RTX A4000 Mobile A4000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 62 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.